Comments on: A Conversation with Boots

By: Tonykeess

Tonykeess — Wed, 20 May 2009 21:48:08 +0000

Neat page=D will definitely visit soon.

By: Erin 84

Erin 84 — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:47:30 +0000

TaxpayerM,
Glad to hear you like Boots. So do I. We need an honest and hard working man in the House who’s only reason for being in there is to represent the people of the 124th. We need someone who brings real world experience as well as the determination to dig into the trenches and get the job done. Boots is that guy. He’s also the kind of guy you can walk up to an have an every day conversation with.

Boots is working his way across the district, trying to get his name out there. If you see him, please feel free to walk up to him and introduce yourself. He’ll most likely put out his hard working farm worn hand to shake yours and ask you for your opinion about the district, and actually take it to heart.

By: Taxpayer M

Taxpayer M — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:24:20 +0000

Putting aside Denise’s comments.

This Barron “Boots” Hetherington, is some one I would really like to find out more about.

Now to Denise’s comments. I took Hanks statement “by removing potential future challengers like myself and Gretchen Sterns.” quite different than you Denise. I took it to mean, strong Conservitives in general. Why you choose to attack Hank is beyond me, but having read Hanks past blogs I feel your way off base. And even if it were a self serving post, WHY would you care?

I just do not get some people, so worried about what everyone else is doing and saying. If you didnt care you wouldnt have responded.

By: Joe The Republican

Joe The Republican — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 06:32:17 +0000

Hank – I like reading your blog. It is informative and you do a good job putting it together. However, Denise does make a good point about name-dropping yourself as a potential candidate. Gretchen has at least put her name in the hat (for Senate). If you consider yourself a future challenger…what are you waiting for? The line of questioning with Boots was great until I read that question. You made yourself sound very pompus and quite frankly, may have just turned off a potential voter. Think Hank…use that law degree.

By: Hey Denise

Hey Denise — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:39:04 +0000

Your right, none of this is that important. So CHILL OUT DUDE!!!

By: Hank Clarke

Hank Clarke — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:35:40 +0000

If I am not that important, why do you find it necessary to post a comment on my blog? Better yet, why did you find it necessary to e-mail 15 of your friends about me? That is sure going to an aweful lot of trouble for someone who doesn’t really matter, right?

By: Denise Cardigan

Denise Cardigan — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:17:36 +0000

Hank: You truly are pompous. Did you actually read your article before you posted it! You have an internet BLOG. You do an occasional radio show. What the hell makes you the conservative mouthpiece of skooks? Your interview is so filled with self-serving questions, it’s pathetic. I don’t expect you to post this like a real journalist getting critiqued would. Hahaha. Redistrict just to keep you and Gretchen out? Give me a break. The reality is you are not that important! You don’t even see what’s happeneing right before your very eyes. You don’t have the ga-nip ga-nops to post this because you fear challenge. So, just to be sure I sent this email to 15 other people who used to buy into your BS postings. Now they will see the truth! The real Hank Clarke! DC