As we make final arrangements to celebrate Christmas and ring in the new year, now is the perfect time to decompress from the past few months’ electoral upheaval and reflect on lessons learned, before gearing up once again on January 5th for another few rounds of political prize fighting.
For you, 2008 was a good one. You stared down a weighty primary challenge from a respected community leader bankrolled by a pack of local reformers, like me, looking to make you the first trophy on their mantle. You parlayed that momentum into your greatest electoral victory, one that finally buried not only a stubborn rival, but also the thorn in your side that was the memory of the infamous midnight pay raise. And after tragedy struck our county and our party, you successfully out-maneuvered both the remnants of the old guard and the rising power of the new guard on your way to the top of the ticket in local politics as our nominee for state senate.
Dave Argall, you took on all comers and knocked them out every time. Congrats.
But, what will you do with what you have been given? Will you look to settle old scores by freezing out those who have forsaken you? Will you seek to consolidate your resources and power to entrench yourself and your friends as the permanent political force in this county for the next few decades?
Both of those options are completely understandable. For years, you have had to play second banana to Jim Rhoades and his north of the mountain army, making you unable to fully push forth your own county-wide agenda. As his successor, you can take this opportunity to brush aside the likes of Champ Holman, Ron Rader, Mary Beth Dougherty, and the remainders of the old War Board clan in favor of your own cast of personal friends and political allies. Moreover, you can become even more of a hero to the rest of the politically established class by crushing the reform movement that both challenged your ascendancy and has been a pain the petard to the collective rulers of the county committee.
If I may, I have another suggestion: Unite us.
Unite us by recognizing that there were manifest reasons why we were torn apart in the first place. Understand that bully politics, nepotism, and straying from core conservative principles to maintain power, was what caused the fissure to begin with. Embrace those failings and take active steps to finally heal the ugly wounds of the past few years, so that we can all move forward together as ONE PARTY. Recognize that there is an all too real reason why you had two serious challenges, one that came within 3 votes of beating you, for the senate seat that in any other place in any other time would have been yours from the beginning.
You can do this in one simple step: Pull out a chair or two at your own table and invite people like me to sit down.
I, and my reform brethren, are not evil. We do not hate you personally. We are not out to destroy the Republican Party. We are just a group of politically active individuals, who are aggravated with the current state of affairs, and speak out for a large group of voters who aren’t as politically active. We are your conservative conscience. Just like that little voice in the back of your head that tells you stealing a candy bar from Brok Sel is bad or driving drunk is dangerous, we are the little voice in your political brain that tells you that tax increases hurt middle-class citizens and over-zealous government spending kills local economies. As annoying as we may be, we provide an important voice that should at least be heard. Just as people who ignore their own Jiminey Cricket make poor life decisions, politicians who ignore their political conscience make poor policy.
Maybe if I or someone like me had your ear back in 2005, we could have waved a big red flag in your face and advised you to not support the pay raise because it was both bad politics and poor leadership. We might have been able to show you how that one vote would start a political avalanche to the current toxic atmosphere that the GOp enjoys today. You might have listened, you might not have, but at least we would have been in the room vehemently arguing our case.
In the same vein, don’t banish Rhoades’ staff and supporters to the nether-region of county politics. You may not always have agreed with their decisions or their tactics, but they can be a valuable asset to you as senator and to the party as a whole. It may be tempting to leave their names off the guest list, but doing so will only cause more dissension in the GOP ranks. I am not suggesting that you make Champ your chief of staff or Ron Rader your main strategist. What I am saying is that like that former high school football star, who humbly returns home after blowing out his knee in spring practice at Penn State, needs to find a new place in his community that doesn’t involve the bright lights on Friday night, the Rhoades people need to find a new place in this party.
Today, you have that opportunity. You have the chance to let Jiminey Cricket out of his cage and place him back on your shoulder. Let us in Dave. I promise, we won’t bite. We may even help make you the leader we never expected you to be, but have been praying for for a long time.

16 Comments
December 24, 2008 at 9:40 am
Very well said Hank!!! Dave simply put, we need a hero. I believe you can do it. Please find a way to unite this party. Merry Christmas and may God bless us all.
December 24, 2008 at 1:17 pm
Dave Argall MUST commit to doing everything in his power to defeat Neal Goodman, Jim Goodman, Tim Holden, and Keith McCall. If he doesn’t, we’re back to square one. Getting him in the Senate is only as valuable as his willingness to help the whole party. Prior to his death, Sen. Rhoades turned over a new leaf and committed himself to knocking out these Democrats. Dave must do the same.
December 28, 2008 at 10:25 am
Why not banish Rhoade’s staff? With the exception of Champ Holman, trying to get a return call or anything out of that staff has been an uphill battle for many.
December 28, 2008 at 2:18 pm
I’ve used Rhoades office over the years and I have no complaints. They were always very professional – just like their boss. Knowing how good Jim Rhoades was at taking care of peoples’ problems, I find it hard to believe that he didn’t expect the same of his staff. Cut out the sniping and let the man rest in peace. Whatever you think about him or his staff, he didn’t deserve a violent death nor did his staff deserve to be faced with dealing with the fallout from it. People in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones – those of you gloating today could wake up tomorrow and find yourself in a worse situation! Happy New Year to all!!
December 28, 2008 at 4:25 pm
This has nothing to do with Rhoades’s staff. This is about maximizing the impact of an Argall victory on March 3rd and turning our party around. Argall must be locked into a commitment to taking out Democrats locally, or he gets no help. It’s that simple.
December 28, 2008 at 10:01 pm
Our party cannot be turned around until the mentality of trying to “out-conservative” each other is banished. I do not mean this against those who post on this board, as I really haven’t seen much of it here. But the rhetoric among many of the younger Republicans has only harmed us.
Trust me, I would love to go on a RINO safari myself, but the nasty rhetoric is destroying our party…rhetoric as seen on other popular blogs, with which most of us are probably familiar.
On that vein, those who have in the past gone on national television to condemn the candidate running against that joke who is about to be inaugurated should not even be considered by the rest of us for any future statewide office.
December 28, 2008 at 11:28 pm
Kevin,
Its not about “out-conservativing” anyone. It is about returning to the principles and values that put our party in power to begin with.
Think back to 1980. The moderate Eisenhower/Nixon wing had ruled the GOP for 30 years. Our pseudo-incumbent president, Gerald Ford, had just been shilacked by a bumpkin governor, 4 years earlier. Their new standard bearer, George HW Bush, was running on more of the same. From this rubble came a new conservatism in the form of Ronald Reagan, who shifted the party away from the big government, moderate leanings to a Goldwater-esque fiscal policy and traditional value social policy.
How was it received? Reagan defeated an incumbent President and served two of the greatest terms in the history of this country, delivering us from the Carter malaise, defeating the Soviet Empire, and creating profound economic opportunity.
Unfortunately, he handed what he built back over to the moderates as he was succeeded by another Eisenhower/Nixon Republican in Bush 41, who turned around and gave up the White House to a philandering white haired slickster.
Enter Newt Gingrich. Armed with the same principles and values that swept Reagan into power 14 years earlier, a group of back bench Republican Congressmen ran a principled campaign espousing firm conservative financial and social principles called the Contract with America against both the democratic majority AND the moderate GOP leadership who were eating from the same trough as the dems, . The result? A resounding victory, one that dwarfs the great democratic tidal wave of 2006.
THIS is what young Republicans like me are trying to accomplish for a third time. A realignment to strong conservative principles that will make us more true to what our party was founded upon AND make us victorious once again.
The choice is simple. Do we want to be the party of Goldwater, Reagan, and Gingrich or do we want to be the party of Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, and Bush?
I choose Reagan. How about you?
December 28, 2008 at 11:29 pm
Kevin you have it backwards.
In fact Kevin what is killing our party is candidates trying to “out liberal” the Democrats.
Look at McCain. When he tried to “out liberal” Obama on a host of issues, he got smashed. You’ll never out-liberal the liberals. The media and Hollywood will see to that. All those in our party who’ve tried to win by “out liberaling” the other guy have gotten smashed. Just ask Gerald Ford, John McCain, etc. On the other hand, when we act like who we are, we kick ass and take names. Just ask Newt Gingrich and Ronald Reagan.
When “we” behave or sound like “them” we lose and they win. It’s that simple. It’s time to get back to basics. That’s where Mr. Argall comes in. Will he try to “out liberal” Steve Lukach and get smashed in grand fashion, or will he convince Republicans, Independents and Reagan Democrats that he actually stands for something other than a promotion up the ladder for himself? Mark my words. If he tries to “out liberal” Lukach he’ll get crushed. He can try to out-liberal all day long and he still won’t carry Pottsville and the north. Meanwhile he’ll lose some of his base in the 124th, ya know those gun-toting bible clingers that Obama spoke so favorably of (not). Or he can act like a real Republican, run up the score in the 124th and pick off enough indies and Reagan Democrats and win. Let’s see how he plays it.
Kevin next year make sure Santa brings you a copy of the Republican Platform. Or you can get it online. Be forewarned, though: based on your comments on this blog, you might not find it to be pleasurable reading. If not, talk to Betty Dries about getting a new registration card. Mr. Kleha will be more than happy to have you.
December 29, 2008 at 7:59 pm
Hank – You make great points and I agree.
Orion – you do as well until your last paragraph, which is perhaps a reflection of the cockiness I find in Toomey worshippers. That attitude is killing the party.
Indeed, McCain was a horrible candidate and a worse senator.
December 30, 2008 at 12:03 am
Kevin why is McCain a bad senator? Who was your choice for president and why?
December 30, 2008 at 1:15 pm
Orion – McCain is too far to the left, although not quite as far as that corpse we know as our Senior Senator. I voted for Huckabee in the primary (geez, I almost accidenlty wrote “hornberger”) and then for McCain in November. I wasn’t happy, but since the only choice was McCain or Hussein, the war hero, not the jihadist, got my vote.
December 30, 2008 at 6:09 pm
I’m confused. So did McCain lose because he tried to out-conservative Hussein?
December 30, 2008 at 7:07 pm
[...] About A Message to Dave Argall [...]
December 30, 2008 at 9:20 pm
R.W. — actually McCain won because we deviated from our forefathers’ wise intentions of who could vote: landowners. They could foresee cocky college students who think they have it all figured out, buying into philosophy that we must spread the wealth. Having no idea how hard it is to work and save to acquire a home and property, they latched on to this joker from Chicago, launching him into a victory he did not deserve.
I am discouraged since, with my entrepreneurial and capitalistic mind, I stand to make a fortune printing Barack Obama toilet paper. The fortune will be swallowed up in higher taxes for lazy bums who choose to be uninsured.
December 31, 2008 at 1:09 pm
Sorry…freudian typo…I meant “mccain lost” not won…
January 5, 2009 at 1:25 pm
Throw your hands in the airrrrrr. Wave em’ like you just don’t careeeeeee!!! Come on party people, listen up, how the man with the plan in the band whips it up! Yeaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!